question

[Respecthelect]

Ron Paul and Gary Johnson's belief in freedom means that they both would support it intellectually. Does it mean that they would make it their top agenda item and shove it down everyone's throat like Obama did with health care? No. If every of the other ten-thousand issues were already solved on the side of freedom and this sort of bill came along, would they vote for it? Probably.

Don't my fellow American's see how the media uses such tiny little nonsensical issues to marginalize the only candidates that can return freedom? Yes, freedom has some quirks, but just because some intellectual discussion leads to a life the reader doesn't want to pursue, doesn't mean he should exercise force to stop others. Don't want to be a prostitute? That's what freedom is. You get to choose. If the reader really cared so much about prostitution, then he should move to Nevada so he can vote against it. But the reader doesn't care about it and neither does Ron Paul or Gary Johnson.

What the reader should care about is internment camps. The choice today is literally 1) let the mainstream media select another internment camp supporter or 2) elect guys who are every bit as "out-there" as Jefferson and Madison. How can the reader allow actual gulags and real kidnapping and murder by the government, but marginalize freedom lovers for this intellectual position.

I predict, many readers will be crying and gnashing their teeth in Obama's internment camps within fifteen years. The government tracks your every keystroke, do you think Mark Levin supporters will be safe? Obama will be gone, but his camps will torture long after.

[MaddMac]

So... does this mean your a Ron Paul supporter? I'm just asking.

[Respecthelect]

I support candidates that support freedom. Mitt Romni's recently veered to the right and says he wants to repeal Obamni care, but he can't say why. He has no underlying principle. He believes government should do whatever is in the "greater-good." Likewise, Santorum, Gingrich, Bachman - they all believe in and vote based on the greater-good. Ron Paul, Gary Johnson, Paul Ryan believe in, vote and can describe why Liberty trumps Greater-good. It's not Democrat vs Republican anymore, it's Liberty vs Greater-good.

I understand Mark L. has heartburn with Ron Paul and I'm not in love with the way Paul phrases things, but he's a darn sight better than Robamni, I mean Romni. Ron Paul will support Israel, even though Libertarian philosophy won't let him say it that way. Look at Obama, he bad-mouths Israel all the time, yet we're conducting the biggest covert war ever against Iran. Left or right, this country supports Israel and it will always support Israel. What would Jefferson or Madison say running for president now? "Stay out of foreign entanglements?" The same as the Libertarians say now. Yet, we'd be right by Israel's side, regardless. We love Jefferson and Madison, don't we?

We will have individual mandates and internment camps under Romni. He might change the names to Romni-care and Re-education camps, but your liberty will be gone, just the same. I invite Mark L. to join me. Give up this Romni folly. We (you Mark, and I) go first under Romni's re-education program. Now is the time to stop it, not after six million or more fellow citizens are interred in a Canadian death camp. Think it's crazy talk? I would have thought so before the Patriot act (spy on everyone, all the time), Obamni-care (eliminate all property rights) and now NDAA-internment (kidnap anyone - no due process). The laws passed. It's not crazy talk anymore.

[MaddMac]

The last I knew TGO was NOT a Romni fan, along with the majority of Americans.

As for supporting Paul... I see NO point in that!