Supreme Court Decision and "Men in Black" Book

[CarefreeDenny]

This outrageous Supreme Court Decision today is no suprise. Another one of Mark's fantastic books, "Men in Black" will explain, with great clarity, what is happening in our country and our court system.

[mlf]

This outrageous Supreme Court Decision today is no suprise. Another one of Mark's fantastic books, "Men in Black" will explain, with great clarity, what is happening in our country and our court system.

I have not heard. WHAT Supreme Court decision today?

[chfnut]

Can we agree a growing unjust judicial system has helped convert appropriate law (ex. guardianship) to one which is damaging to the public! At present, it operates to ensnare the most vulnerable people in a larger and larger industry. It has become a feeding trough for unethical lawyers and "fiduciaries" appointed by the courts to protect, but many of whom become nothing more than predators. My experience; family Courts sets up various parties to exploit senior deaths, taking advantage with the dissolving and breakup of families. It’s quite an industry, court officers feeding income to state officials with a few select others thrown in.

Focus on the best common solution. 1. Pressure authorities to prosecute ethical misconduct as the felony it is. 2. Allow the public to present testimony & evidence to credible groups (Ex.; Community Groups, watchdog groups, etc.). Extending ‘grand jury’ rights to civil justice sector should be given the same rights as the criminal ‘grand jury’. These groups of laypeople would be able to allow indictments of criminals from -us denied justice.

Getting up after being knocked down is the tuff part… Proudly we face the challenges. The 1st line is retortical.

[DGK22]

I just watched Newt Gingrich’s October 7, 2011 speech to the Values Voters Summit and thought it was great. Here is a link to the video:

http://www.newt.org/news/newt-gingrich- ... ial-branch

Here is an excerpt from his speech:

“Let me be clear. Judicial supremacy is factually wrong, it is morally wrong, and it is an affront to the American system of self-government. One of the major reasons that I am running for president of the United States is the 9th Circuit Court decision in 2002 that one nation under God, in the Pledge of Allegiance, was unconstitutional. That decision to me had the same effect that the Dred Scott decision extending slavery to the whole country had on Abraham Lincoln, because I thought, if an American appeals court could be so radically out of touch with America that it could seek to block children from saying one nation under God as part of their description of America, that we had come to a point when we needed a constitutional crisis to reassert the legislative and executive branches' legitimate prerogatives to teach the judiciary that they cannot be anti-American and expect us to tolerate them radically changing our society by judicial dictate.

Now, what I'm saying to you is in the best tradition of the American Revolution. Read the Declaration of Independence. A very large number of its specific charges against Great Britain involve dictatorial judges. The fact is, the Founding Fathers deeply distrusted judges and thought that the lawyer class was dangerous and that you could not give them unbridled power or they would undermine and destroy free society.”