Supreme Court Decision and "Men in Black" Book

Discussion of Mark's new book

Moderator: mlf

Supreme Court Decision and "Men in Black" Book

Postby CarefreeDenny » Mon May 04, 2009 1:13 pm

This outrageous Supreme Court Decision today is no suprise. Another one of Mark's fantastic books, "Men in Black" will explain, with great clarity, what is happening in our country and our court system.
CarefreeDenny
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 12:47 pm

Re: Supreme Court Decision and "Men in Black" Book

Postby mlf » Mon May 04, 2009 1:18 pm

CarefreeDenny wrote:This outrageous Supreme Court Decision today is no suprise. Another one of Mark's fantastic books, "Men in Black" will explain, with great clarity, what is happening in our country and our court system.

I have not heard. WHAT Supreme Court decision today?
I am MLF. That's short for 'Mark Levin Fan'. I'm a fan of Mark and the Admin on this site. I also OWN this site. I pay for it by myself and don't accept any donations. I moderate this forum by myself the way I want.
User avatar
mlf
Site Admin
 
Posts: 2008
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 12:37 pm
Location: Delaware

Re: "Men in Black" Book

Postby chfnut » Wed Oct 14, 2009 3:35 pm

Can we agree a growing unjust judicial system has helped convert appropriate law (ex. guardianship) to one which is damaging to the public! At present, it operates to ensnare the most vulnerable people in a larger and larger industry. It has become a feeding trough for unethical lawyers and "fiduciaries" appointed by the courts to protect, but many of whom become nothing more than predators. My experience; family Courts sets up various parties to exploit senior deaths, taking advantage with the dissolving and breakup of families. It’s quite an industry, court officers feeding income to state officials with a few select others thrown in.

Focus on the best common solution. 1. Pressure authorities to prosecute ethical misconduct as the felony it is. 2. Allow the public to present testimony & evidence to credible groups (Ex.; Community Groups, watchdog groups, etc.). Extending ‘grand jury’ rights to civil justice sector should be given the same rights as the criminal ‘grand jury’. These groups of laypeople would be able to allow indictments of criminals from -us denied justice.

Getting up after being knocked down is the tuff part… Proudly we face the challenges. The 1st line is retortical.
User avatar
chfnut
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 1:38 pm
Location: Reno, NV


Return to Liberty and Tyranny

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest