Mark Levin spoke with Congressman Peter Hoekstra (R-MI) about the accusation that the CIA withheld information; Congress was not briefed because the program “never happened“:
Congressman Hoekstra also spoke to CBS this morning:
Rumor has it that the CIA has also not briefed Congress about the secret mission to land on the Sun.
Update: I’ve replaced the audio with a good copy.
Poor Rush,Can't even enjoy the dam superbowl this year.And it took two government motor's to beat one Ford Fusion... 
.jpg)
So now we have to stain the credibility of the CIA in order to resurrect the credibility of the Speaker. It is up to the republicans to extinguish the claim and loudly publish the reasoning behind it.
Liberals can’t just admit they knew about waterbording just to make them self look good and make straw mans like they did with the CIA. Just Admit you knew
We know that this methodology is designed to breath new life into the speaker and to take heat off the President’s failed economic agenda but this week it might also serve as distraction from Sotomayor’s nomination hearings. To be certain she knows about what and how she will be questioned and I already know her answers since Chucky Schumer and many others have already given their versions. Chief among her excuses for a racist and bigoted vocabulary will be the remarks made by Alito whereby he stated that he was influenced by the plight of minorities in the criminal justice system. The positions of Alito and Sotomayor are, however, one hundred and eighty degrees in opposition. From Alito’s perspective he made it clear his background would allow him to treat all people equally and without racial, class or gender bias. On the other hand Sotomayor made it clear that, because of her background as a latina from a distinct geographically area, she is better than others and therefore may treat people differently based upon nationality, gender and background. In other words Alito looks at everyone equally and Sotomayor sees some differently, based upon background, nationality and gender and that perspective may allow her decisions to treat them differently than others. That is more than a hint of impropriety and the very last type of error we need to incorporate into a nomination process to fulfill the unconstitutional requirement of diversity on the nation’s highest court.