Last night, Mark Levin urged listeners to get their news about Iran from the Internet, not the mainstream media, to really see what it going on in Iran. In addition, Mark spoke of President Obama’s pathetic response to events there. No matter what Obama said or left unsaid, America was going to be used as a foil by the Iranian regime. “Barack Obama needs to be President of the United States and speak out against what is going on in Iran.”
There are many great web sites relaying the news from Iran or pointing out credible sources of information, including HotAir.com, the National Review Online (and the Corner there), the Gateway Pundit, among dozens of others. Even today, only the usual suspects had the courage to ask tough questions at Obama’s press conference, reports Michelle Malkin.
:cool:
.jpg)
As much as I like Rush and Hannity, as much as I admire and respect Laura and Ann, I have to say that Mark is by far the most sincere of all the conservative commentators. He speaks directly to me, and I am sure he has the same effect on others.
I cannot believe the spineless resident of the public housing at 1600 Pennsylvania has decided to “see how this plays out”. Dutch Reagan is drilling holes horizontally in the California terrain. This is paramount to us “waiting on Japan’s next move” after pearl harbor or putting off D Day until we see what the “Winds of change” blow our way. He has an agenda for redistributing the wealth and radically changing our country so “little things” like the turmoil in Iran are just bumps in his road to socialism.
We as conservatives are falling short if we do not do all that we can do to remove all the power from him we can, otherwise you will not recognize America in ten years.
Gee, I wonder why the Iranian government’s latest range of brutality, which is more aptly described as a massacre, could not have been avoided considering that the US, the Big Satan, did its best to be as neutral and silent as was possible. We never stood with the demonstrators, played a wait and see strategy for fear of provoking a more severe government crackdown and yet it happened despite these extraordinary efforts not to interfere. In fact, it seems to me, our silence was also associated with a willingness to negotiate with whatever Iranian fraction evolved. Despite such a brilliant concept, approved by great diplomats such as Henry Kissinger and historians such as Pat Buchanan, talk show hosts such as Bill O’Reilly and a President experienced in the ways of maniacal theocrats garnished from a 20-year relationship with his Chicago Reverend… the violence actually increased.
In all fairness, considering the relative inexperience that the Administration has in mid-east affairs, the strategy may have worked because at least the crazy mullahs and the megalomaniac President did not do to the Iranian citizens what Saddam did to the Sunnis in the south and the Kurds in the north… at least not yet.