Friday, Mark discussed the Democrat debate last night. Every one of them wants our country to lose in Iraq!
Mark’s right! These are very, very dangerous and dumb people!
[Mark Levin Fan is proudly powered by WordPress.]
| DJIA | 10119.55 | ||
| NASDAQ | 2162.91 | ||
| S&P 500 | 1077.39 | ||
| Gold Nov 09 | 1186.90 | ||
| Crude Oil Dec 09 | 76.90 |
Poor Rush,Can't even enjoy the dam superbowl this year.And it took two government motor's to beat one Ford Fusion... 
.jpg)
Bad Behavior has blocked 1018 access attempts in the last 7 days.
Take note of the Circus song when the libs were talking. Shows that they are a bunch of clowns.
You know what’s really, REALLY terrifying??? Hillary is actually the “HAWK” in this collection of idiots!!
Let me be absolutely CLEAR: that observation is NOT a “compliment” of that phony witch……it’s an absolute INDICTMENT of the DEMOCRATS!!!
And I’ll bet you Joe Lieberman AGREES.
I would hope he does. I’d like to think he’s shaking his head in bewilderment at what his party has devolved into-a snarling pack of dhimmis.
Hellary a ‘hawk’? Relatively speaking, perhaps, but I rather suspect that she (like the scuzwad she’s married to) simply can’t bring herself to denounce her own vote to authorize the use of force in Iraq (IOW admit a ‘mistake’). When it comes to her, it’s more like: HOCK…PTOOEY!
Dangerous and dumb are NOT a good mix. Oh Lord, PLEASE MAKE FRED RUN!!!!!
Shrillary is going to face a moment of truth when the “clean” emergency spending bill comes up. Maybe SHE would welcome being recalled from office! If she votes for it, as she must, she will forsake the hard left of her party, which is the party’s base. If this disenchanted base does its “get out the vote” effort for Nader or anyone else that they BELIEVE will bring about America’s defeat, that would cost Shrillary some vital percentage points all across the nation! This should be good!
Would this be considered a shot in the arm?
http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ODZjYTZlMzYzYzkzNjU3YTgyMWNjOGYyNDA2ZThlMTg=
I had a yeehaw! moment reading that article, short though it is.
Yes, Steph! I don’t know if you are already a Texan or not, but I regard you as an Honorary Texan, just as our Australian friend HankWilliamsIV is! Great link! It does confirm for me the belief that last year’s elections were NOT a mandate for surrender! If THAT were the case, then Ned Lament (as Rush calls him!) would have been there to vote for this travesty that is now going to President Bush. But he wasn’t there! In fact, it was Liebermann who , in the courage of his convictions, did what was right! And THAT is a good thing to have confirmed by good polling- the kind that conforms to REALITY and not to the ALTERNATE REALITY in which the Libs so desperately wish us all to believe! Yee-Haww! LOL
Well, thanks, Dub… I guess being an honorary Texan is a good thing,
?
In my heart, I couldn’t believe that so many people in this country really thought the way Congress tried to make us believe. I was glad to see it confirmed even if big media never shows it.
Basically, she already HAS “denounced” her use-of-force vote, DrWho——like Kerry, Edwards, Rockefeller, Reid, Levin, Murtha & all the rest of those politically-dishonest pleebs, she claims she’s been “misled” by BUSH.
Gee, how ORIGINAL!
But she WON’T get away with it (no matter HOW much the MSM tries to protect her). She won’t get away with it because she ALSO has her years in the White House when “Bubba” was signing an executive order to have Saddam removed from power while making EXACTLY THE SAME CASE ABOUT WMD THAT BUSH DID.
She STOOD BY THAT, she AGREED WITH IT, and she REPEATED IT ON THE SENATE FLOOR IN 2002.
She’s ALSO on tape in 2003 telling “Code Pink” that removing Saddam was “necessary”, that she did her “OWN investigation” and talked to “a LOT of people who’s opinion I respect”, and that (last, but certainly not LEAST) the issue “goes back nearly a DECADE with me”.
NAILS IN THE COFFIN, BABY!!!!
Once a Republican candidate gets her one-on-one in a debate where she’s not being protected (assuming she wins the nomination), she’s DONE!!
There will be nothing left but the black pointed hat on a pile of ashes.
And I can’t f***ing WAIT!
Heh-heh-heh!!
Yes, Steph- it IS a very good thing! Yeah ScottT- the truth works on Libs the way that a bucket of water worked on the Wicked Witch at the end of the Wizard Of Oz! “I’M MELTING! I’M MELTING! I’M MELTING!”… Yeah, this is gonna be sweet! At some point, Shrillary is going to have to stand alone and face an interlocuter who will expose her for the pinko traitor scumbag wicked witch she truly is?
I meant to end that last sentence with an exclamation mark and not a question mark! : “…expose her for the pinko traitor scumbag wicked witch she TRULY IS!!!!!
Now STOP it, Dub……you’re not being fair to pinko traitor scumbag wicked witches!
LOL!!!!
Just for the record. Hillary stated that she did her own independent investigation and that was why she voted for the war. Was her investigation and that of her husband’s as faulty as the Bush investigation? As I remember it was the libs that devastated our ability to procure intelligence. Remember Torricelli preventing us from using “unclean†intelligence sources.
When the libs refer to Bush falsely decrying that Iraq was an imminent threat it is simply not true. Bush justified the invasion because he believed that Iraq would become an imminent threat and we could not wait until then. He was being proactive.
Besides there being 17 UN violations Saddam actively encouraged suicide bombing and subsidized each Palestinian family with $25,000 for such a sacrifice. He tried to assassinate George Bush 41. Each of these activities by themselves could be considered mandatory reasons for invading Iraq.
Hussein was thrilled over 9/11. The fact that Al Quida did it did not mean that he would not do the same when the opportunity arose. If Al Quida created mass destruction with box cutters and US planes Saddam was at least as capable of doing the same. In fact there are too many loose nukes out there for “oil for food money†to purchase.
In my field the fact that an agent is not discovered that is causative for a particular disease does not rule out that the agent may have been “missedâ€ÂÂ. I’m certainly not convinced that serious weapons in the Iraqi arsenal were absolutely absent. Nor are such weapons necessary to achieve a grandiose result. 9/11 was a test. I’m certain that all terrorist types are planning events even bigger than 9/11.
Libs will react after the event. That is the only way they can ever justify a military action. Do you think that Israel can afford to do that? With technology to miniaturize weaponry and to take out water and sewer facilities or transportation systems this country can be turned upside down very easily. We cannot afford to wait either. We are too sophisticated and dependent on technologies that are easy targets. I do not have a donkey ready and willing to transport me, or a well that I readily drink from nor do I grow my own food. This country is too easy and sensitive a target to allow the libs to defend us.
What if: Should Congress successfully force our retreat from Iraq, the President should then turn around and say to Israel, do what you will? He does, after all, define foreign policy.
Just an idea and not well thought out… more a jumping off point to open debate.
Didn’t Israel do a preemtive strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities years ago? Was it not successful? Why is Israel waiting for Iran to get nukes this time? I wish that Israel would repeat history and do another pre-emptive strike in order to prevent Iran from getting the nuclear weapons that their leader Ahmadinejad has already vowed to use upon Israel!
Well, I just looked it up- in 1981 Israel took out IRAQ’s nuclear facilities! Why don’t they just do the same to Iran, today? I know that I would breathe a little more easily if they would!
It is very critical that the Iran strike occur just before they have dispersible nuclear material. That will provide the greatest damage. Done after that everyone has a contamination problem. The Israelis have no choice. They will act because they will lose their very lives and the State of Israel will cease to exist. They have less than 9 million citizens and I would imagine as much as a third of the population would die within a year. It is too small a Country and cannot survive the radioactive contamination that will also occur.
With all the nuclear weapons in the world I mainly fear a nuclear armed Mid-East. When you prefer the after life to the present life you then look forward to the inevitable consequences of retaliation. Not a good thing.
Explain these consequences to Ms. Pelosi while she sips a sauvignon blanc and eats foie gras. She has no clue about what to do.
These Islamofascists have a well-known slogan: “Today is Friday, tomorrow is Saturday, and then it will be Sunday”. And the dark meaning of this slogan is that today they fight for the means and opportunity to gain totalitarian power over the world, and then they wipe out Israel (on the Jewish sabbath), and THEN they wipe out the Christian infidels (on the day of Christ’s resurrection).
Ms. Pelosi has no idea as to what she SHOULD DO, because the only thing that she knows how to do is to blame it on President George W. Bush!
After seeing the group all together (I couldn’t bring myself to watch or listen to any part of this tripe), I’m convinced that this political party is our “communist” party. They’re in lock-step, brain-washed mode. They just repeat the same lines over and over again. They repeat attacks against the Prez over and over like robots. I hope the republican candidate, whoever it will be, will come out swinging. The democrats are out for blood. Here in D.C. their little dnc college flunkies were out again full-force at lunch time trolling the streets with their clipboards duping anyone they could into joining their atrocious party. They’re out for blood and I’m afraid that exposing the democrats for what they are and making the case for solid conservative ideas isn’t going to be enough to get through and fight these people. I’m very worried about the future of this country with the more power I see democrats gaining again. They’re like a cancer you can’t get rid of.
The party is currently more fascist. I recall that Ayn Rand stated years ago that the left in this country would come at us as fascists rather than socialists. Fascism was to the right of the NAZI party while communism was to the left. They are all collectivists. Remember that fascists allow you to own private property but they take a good amount of the profit. This is a European mentality. Rights given away are rights lost.
I call them socialists because people understand that better. I have people from the left who are so used to me describing them as socialists that they themselves now admit that that is what they are.
Right on, my brethren! dcmale- I too am worried about the future of our nation- the Libs ARE like a chronically recurring disease. They are EVIL- and they are going to be eternally present and they are going to have to be faced down continually! I’m glad that I don’t face them alone! task- yeah! Congratulations on getting these socialists to admit that that is what they are! That is hard to do- for part of the Liberal mask is to try to appear to be all for liberty and capitalism. These Leftist collectivists DO try to come on as if they wish to support private initiative and private property . But they don’t care for them any more than they absolutely HAVE to! They are willing to let the geese that lay the golden eggs to have a little bit of luxury (they will let them HAVE it, but they will foster general resentment of it when it is in the hands of Conservatives!) just so long as they can continue to snatch away the golden eggs. Limousine Liberals of course are entitled to be war profiteers (like Feinstein!) and to do dirty land deals (like Harry Reid!) and they are allowed to do this with impunity! So Ayn Rand was right- again!
After independent research, much thought and study; I am supporting the run of Fred Thompson. This was not an easy decision. I wanted to make sure that this time I could fully put my heart soul and yes, dollars into a candidate that would represent my beliefs and vision of where I want the direction of my country to go. We had a spousal discussion, family decision; and we all agreed..we are a Draft Fred and Support Fred Family. I pray that he will not let me down..I have a feeling he is what I, and in turn this nation is looking for: a leader.
I believe we have such a leader in Fred Thompson. When Thompson was interviewed on Fox, he said, “it is a decision of whether the man fits the times.” The time is right for Thompson and for us to be led by him. Sorry Rudy..but maybe VP for Rudy..now that is a ticket worth fighting for. Just my two cents..thanks for letting me share. Great column as always Great One.
Thompson/Giuliani WOULD be a ticket worth fighting for! And I would fight for a Giuliani/Thompson ticket, too, but I would not have the same enthusiasm. I believe that Thompson would be able to lead a Conservative movement, the way that W has not. I do not think that Giuliani would lead a Conservative movement any more than W does, and this is a real source of concern for me. Run, Fred, run!!
In light of the defeatist left’s new desire to see our blessed Nation fail in the War On Terror, I’ve composed a version of our National Anthem we may all hear someday unless we have the resolve to say “NUTS” to this defeatist horde.
The Libocratic Anthem
Oh, hey did you see, in the orange surreal light,
what so shamefully sails due to libocrat scheming,
whose white clothe without stars, no bold colors in sight,
in safe houses we watch, for the past we are dreaming.
In the fallout’s orange glare, people scream in despair,
gave proof in our plight that the libs didn’t care.
Today they regret the path foolishly paved,
the old home of the free, now the home of weak slaves.