<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Organized Against Labor (Mark Levin Against Academia Promoting Ideology on the Public Dime)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marklevinfan.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5799" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marklevinfan.com/?p=5799</link>
	<description>Unofficial fan website for the Great One, Mark Levin!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:34:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: task</title>
		<link>http://marklevinfan.com/?p=5799&#038;cpage=1#comment-44974</link>
		<dc:creator>task</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marklevinfan.com/?p=5799#comment-44974</guid>
		<description>Labor unions are so closely associated with politics and the political process that a disclosure of how they use their money, methods and ideology, within learning institutions, needs to be vetted. The very opening sentence (http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/10/12/labor) refers to a &quot;conservative legal organization&quot;, not just a legal organization. Most legal organizations have a political flavor that is often less intensive and directional than any union. The words â€œunionâ€, â€œliberalâ€ and â€œdemocratâ€ are distinctly indistinct and that is why one need not refer to unions as anti-conservative (liberal) because they are simply understood to be such. Labor (American citizens) is certainly less partisan than those who take credit to represent them and not alternative interests. Ultimately educational institutions that camouflage political agendas should not hide intentions within course menus under any pretense and especially not under a diversity manifesto, because business is not the other side of the argument. Business is the business of America. No one is stopping the AAUP from exercising any freedom to teach; this is a request for information and not a denial of subject material and for those with nothing to misrepresent the compliance should not be of any concern or difficulty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Labor unions are so closely associated with politics and the political process that a disclosure of how they use their money, methods and ideology, within learning institutions, needs to be vetted. The very opening sentence (<a href="http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/10/12/labor" rel="nofollow">http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/10/12/labor</a>) refers to a &#8220;conservative legal organization&#8221;, not just a legal organization. Most legal organizations have a political flavor that is often less intensive and directional than any union. The words â€œunionâ€, â€œliberalâ€ and â€œdemocratâ€ are distinctly indistinct and that is why one need not refer to unions as anti-conservative (liberal) because they are simply understood to be such. Labor (American citizens) is certainly less partisan than those who take credit to represent them and not alternative interests. Ultimately educational institutions that camouflage political agendas should not hide intentions within course menus under any pretense and especially not under a diversity manifesto, because business is not the other side of the argument. Business is the business of America. No one is stopping the AAUP from exercising any freedom to teach; this is a request for information and not a denial of subject material and for those with nothing to misrepresent the compliance should not be of any concern or difficulty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
