Good for Mark! Mark was taking aim at Byron York, among others, for being content with supporting the status quo.
Mark pointed out Christine O’Donnell as an example of a must-win conservative who is being passed over by the so-called conservatives in the media.
You want to save this country, then you cannot vote for Mike Castle. Mike Castle will be the most liberal Republican in the Senate and he will be more liberal than most Democrats.
So, what will it be, conservative media? Is Mike Castle your guy? Mark Levin is right and you know it!
This is not a game we’re playing! Our country is being destroyed right before our very eyes! There is no time to sit back waiting to see if a conservative can win so you can jump on the band wagon at the last minute. If you want to save our country, you must support the conservative RIGHT NOW!!! Tomorrow may never come, folks! This is serious. Now get with the program. Endorse the conservative candidates! Write positively about the conservatives! Grow a set, as Mark would say!
.jpg)
Mark hits the nail on the head – AGAIN!
Christine is a reliable Conservative who steadfastly is:
Pro-Constitution – Pro-National Defense – Pro-Life – Pro-Family – Pro-Second Amendment – Pro-States Rights – Pro-Border Security – Pro-Free Market – Pro-Freedom – Anti-High Taxes – Anti-Big Government – Anti-ObamaCare.
(Aren’t these the values we said we are looking for?)
They are mine!
Learn more about Christine and see how she compares to Castle.
http://christine2010.com
Sadly, Mark is correct. A lot of the so-called “conservative media” does little or nothing to promote real conservatives. They act like junior members of the MSM. Thank God for real conservatives like the Tea Party and 9/12 groups, themselves often ignored by the conservative media. And thank God for the bloggers who have so ardently backed great candidates like Chritine, Sharron Angle, and Carly Fiorina.
Conservatives comprehend that American values and the freedoms those values are based upon are not confiscated by liberals but are actually forfeited by moderates that stood aside or with liberals while core principles were compromised.
Consider the recent Bolton decision denying Arizona the right to enforce current immigration law. Whenever I hear someone exclaim that the Court ruled I say, “ you mean a judge ruled” and I then check the credentials of that judge.
Does anyone remember the 2007 decision in Mamaroneck NY where Judge Colleen McMahon ruled that the City violated the equal protection rights of six Latino immigrants (all John Doe’s) and ordered the Town to pay $550,000 in damages? I remember it well and it was saturated with partisan political advocacy. In fact it is almost a Landmark Decision designed to illustrate how far the 14th Amendment can be stretched to achieve judicial legitimacy when examination reveals the conclusions were philosophical biased to advance a political agenda and not the law. The law was subordinated to the whimsical political preferences of a judge that had a preferential outcome in mind and she worked hard to achieve that goal. I’ve often rallied against the 14th Amendment not because it is wrong but because it serves the left well when they misapply its intended purpose. To the left the 14th Amendment is not reserved for Americans but applies equally to the entire World and they consistently misapply it through the confiscation of freedom and property (belonging to Americans) and reallocating their distribution outside the context of our Constitutional Republic where laws are meant to protect what they steal.
How does this happen? You first have to ask yourself what Colleen McMahon has in common with Judge Susan Bolton. Is it their gender or their heritage? Neither. It is that they were both political unelected appointees of Bill Clinton and they received their positions only because they had a lot more in common with a political philosophy than they had with the law. While Conservative judges often apply bad law because such laws exist they don’t generate those laws. Elections have consequences and elected left wing Presidents such as Bill Clinton appoint judges designed to create decisions which undermine other laws, namely Constitutionally derived laws, along with the Constitution itself and the natural laws that define the only rights of man upon which our republic and social heritage is based.
Bill Clinton appointed judges that received the blessing and approval of moderates. Arizona may very well not have to deal with the recent Bolton decision had it not been for John McCain and other moderates who supported those appointees. In fact Arizona and other Border States would almost certainly not have illegal immigration problems of current intensity had it not been for McCain, Lindsey Graham, the twin Senators from Maine and moderates who are now about to approve Kagan for a lifetime Court appointment where her decisions could someday extinguish any remedy against the loss of liberty.
In 1964 Goldwater said, “Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice; moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.” When you vote for moderates you unintentionally approve of the eventual destruction of principles that keep our society free and prosperous. There is no freedom in moderation. There is only the certainty that someday moderates will eventually again compromise upon what they previously gave away. Liberty needs restoration; moderation always goes in the wrong direction.
There are real conservative grassroots all over running for office and the elites do nothing but work around them, pick their tired old candidates to keep in their back pocket and then they promptly lose..
The elites have proven that they would rather lose to a Democrat than have a Republican candidate who does not owe them 30 pieces of silver.
Mark – keep up the great work! I suspect you are making a huge impact out there. All I have to do is look at the number of people who “like” you on FB…the number grows daily! Thank you for calling attention to the very important races across the U.S., and pointing out who is deserving of our support.