After denying that health care reform will be restricted to legal citizens, the Prez is going to be additionally pressed to make the case that terrorists are entitled to Constitutional protections by liberal courts. The public is (thankfully) losing faith in Presidential sloganeering as a philosophy of governance. The folks are looking to real action to make their judgments.

It is interesting that so many of our judiciary, on one hand, love to expand Constitutional access for everyone yet, on the other hand, find the Constitution dated and needing renewal as they speak of their enamor of foreign constitutions and laws. However, when those same foreign laws have allowed for the evolution of stricter terrorist detention and questioning protocols such foreign laws never play a part in their judicial decisions. Then they find our Constitution more than suitable; they find it absolutely applicable. They have one job. Apply the law as it is written; nothing more or less. Bush really did not make laws or exceptions to the law. He reminded us of the laws already written. Sometimes he was mistaken but more often the judiciary deliberately got it wrong. If you want to make laws or provide exceptions outside of the legislature you need look no further than the Obama Administration that does what it wants with or without authority and without an utterance from the legislature or any notice by the media. Presently we are in a state of Constitutional suspended animation.