Comments on: Mark Levin: Beck saying ‘McCain would have been worse’ is ‘pandering’ and ‘pathetic’

By: Sgt Tim

Sgt Tim — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 11:00:46 +0000

There is no “heat of the moment” thinking involved here. Give the devil his due, Beck knows enough to look over his shoulder and ensure the parades he jumps in front of don’t turn off leaving him a lone idiot in heavy traffic. The risk here is some good portion of the parade will follow when Beck goes where his ratings and the money leads him.

By: Steve

Steve — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 03:05:39 +0000

Isn’t there more important things to worry about? More pressing issues instead of talking about Glenn Beck? He (Beck) is not my favorite talking head, but we have idiots like Keith Olberman and Chris “Hard On” Matthews spewing their bile about how awesome Barrack is, that is more pathetic than what Beck said. I don’t think Beck likes Obama, I just think he said something stupid in the heat of the moment. We have unbelievable (in a bad way) changes happening… and possibly having a health-care “reform” (that will pretty much ruin this nation) on the verge of happening… so I think we should stick together and focus on crushing that.

By: Sgt Tim

Sgt Tim — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:53:14 +0000

Hanna: Go peddle your wares somewhere else.

By: hanna

hanna — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:37:23 +0000

Moderator — Link to image deleted

THE SIMPLE TRUTH

By: task

task — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 12:38:09 +0000

We all know that McCain would not have advanced conservatism but he would have left a semblance of our country behind that we could build on. You cannot modify, change and destroy this much (and it isnâ€™t over) and expect to immediately repair it post Obama. The cement will have dried by then. The programs that they enact today will consume our freedom tomorrow and for a long time after we are dead and buried. I donâ€™t know what you thought of Palin but she figured prominently in my support for McCain. Based on all who hate her she figured prominently in their support for Obama. Considering that part of the Obama platform was to change the way the world perceives America you should especially notice how are enemies currently view us. In my profession Iâ€™ve watched little dogs badger large dogs into submission. A lot of the advantage we have over our enemies is psychological and that translates to needing less force on the ground and less American lives lost. Obama has clearly given more hope to our enemies than Jimmy Carter or the NY Times ever has. Cheaper health insurance is not the first priority of any government whether it be a constitutional republic or a socialist oligarchy; the protection and defense of its citizens has been the mainstay of government and leadership since we existed as tribes and although we may have changed the technology government has the same order of priority today as well.

By: MLF

MLF — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 12:38:08 +0000

ScottT, I was going to mention that point, myself. You beat me to it! LOL!

By: Art Telles

Art Telles — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 05:04:08 +0000

‘You’re A Big Dope’ Is Still Not A Response…

In fact, it is shallow and puerile and it reminds me of Michael Savage in his insults to people that get under his skin.

Now I understand why the word ‘dope’ was in your opening sentence, and I am well aware that Mark Levin uses that line… I listen every day… and I still don’t like it.

That’s no way to win friends and influence people to the cause of defending the U.S. Constitution… and hopefully the future presidency of Sarah Palin.

However, is it just me, or is Mark getting mellower and more patient as he is learning to suffer foolish callers with equanimity?

Your response was weak, since the point is very strong because it is historically accurate…

It is a FACT that in 8 years GWBush was a bigger spender than Lyndon Baines Johnson, he did not use the veto pen to limit spending and he was not challenged by the namby pamby Republicans.

Bush’s and McCain’s socialism put together, as you put it, and Bush’s silly remark about saving the free market system by abandoning free market principles definitely are not as bad as what Obama has in store for America.

Your point is not well made since you agree with the essence of what I have written here.

So, what’s your point?

It seems that we agree that Obama and his ‘transform America’ rhetoric reveals an agenda that probably most of the people who voted for him will reject in 2010 and in also in 2012.

‘You are smart, Art – not’ is shallow and… a substantive response is not possible because the final sentence, ‘McCain would…’ is confusing.

By: ScottT

ScottT — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 04:50:35 +0000

Good grief, these Tin-Foilers are fit for Dr. Loomis.

If they had to have Obama instead of McCain as president to (as they say) “wake them up”……that pretty much tells you all you need to know about THEM.

YIKES!!

By: Sgt Tim

Sgt Tim — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 03:31:47 +0000

So, no problem. In 3 1/2 more years, the next generations will be saddled with a debt so huge they will be doomed to poverty. Thanks for the inspiration, Obama. McCain would have spent a lot but not entrenched socialism yet future generations need the pain. You are smart, Art – not.

By: MLF

MLF — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 03:29:49 +0000

Art, this is my website and Mark Levin uses that line. If you listened you would know. Your point did not escape me. I just flatly reject it as weak. All of the Bush and McCain socialism put together do not come even close to what Obama has in store for us.