Comments on: Beck ‘ain’t no Rush Limbaugh,’ says Mark Levin

By: unnecessary1

unnecessary1 — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 04:08:22 +0000

We have been listening to Mark go on about Beck (without mentioning him by name) for quite some time now. Why did Mark not call him out by name before this? Mark did so with many other people, why not Beck?

By: MLF

MLF — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:29:24 +0000

Um, that’s “Dr.” RuPaul…

By: Mandrake

Mandrake — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:36:35 +0000

—I have voted the lesser of 2 evils all my life (Republican.) No more! Glenn is absolutely correct. Both parties are part of the 2 headed statist monster and I am tired of Republicans stabbing me in the back after they get into office. Ron Paul is one of the few I would vote for.
—As for plagerizing conservative principles…that is nonsense. Everyone today is plagerizing conservatives who fought for the same principles at the time of George Washington. The same battles existed in that era. You can thank early conservatives for the Bill of Rights.
Mandrake

By: DrWhoFan65

DrWhoFan65 — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 08:32:52 +0000

That would be good. Please let us know if you get a reply.

By: Mo K.

Mo K. — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 05:28:38 +0000

I’ll be the first one to admit I made a mistake in voting for 3rd party candidate Perot. It was a case of “voting my conscience”, but in hindsight, it won Clinton the election. Sure, I believe in the ideals of (for example) the Constitution Party, but they’re wasting their time and we’re wasting our money if we contribute to them.
We need a strong conservative in the Republican party.

The Electoral College determines who wins. They don’t vote on a third, fourth, or fifth party.

I think Beck is smart enough to realize this (he’s only slightly older than I), but I’ll send him a message, just in case.

By: DrWhoFan65

DrWhoFan65 — Sun, 20 Sep 2009 11:42:49 +0000

And furthermore…perhaps Mr. Beck should make the first move and invite Mark onto his tv show, call-in or otherwise. One doesn’t really expect Mr. Beck to go on another radio show when he has his own, do you think? Yeah, but it’s a little different with Sean and Mark; they’re best friends, you know.

There is an opportunity to ‘patch this up’, but the initiative shouldn’t be Mark’s. As task said earlier, if the transgressions ceased, so would the animosity. Hm??

By: DrWhoFan65

DrWhoFan65 — Sun, 20 Sep 2009 11:16:00 +0000

Rush was on with Beck, yeah…week before last, I believe. I saw it via Rush’s site, and it wasn’t bad.

Some may cite that as an example of Rush’s self-promotion tendencies, as if he NEEDS any promotion at all, being #1. He’s gone on many shows over the years, most often by phone as in this case; the Greta thing was unusual for him. And why do they bring him on (or try to)? It jacks up their ratings.

Rush stays above the fray because he CAN…but I think it’s safe to say that-as with Mark-if his friends were attacked, he wouldn’t hesitate to sound off.

Mark might’ve been wiser to ignore the media puke’s email, because it may have had precisely this intent.

For the record…task, I was replying to your comment, but only the first part was directed at you.

By: task

task — Sun, 20 Sep 2009 02:46:59 +0000

Wasn’t Rush on a Beck show or visa versa?

By: Catherine

Catherine — Sun, 20 Sep 2009 02:05:43 +0000

Heath: Mark was not just supporting Rush when he compared Glenn Beck to George Jefferson. I have never heard Glenn Beck attack another conservative that way. Repeatedly I have heard him praise Rush Limbaugh, and when callers have told him about the attacks of others, he has always defended his colleagues. I had no idea that the “back-bencher” Mark has been criticizing is GB. I still say, Mark, work it out off the air, because you come across as a jealous jerk with the George Jefferson remarks. GB is building his fan-base in large part because he doesn’t seem to have the massive, bloviating ego of so many of his fellow hosts.

By: Sgt Tim

Sgt Tim — Sat, 19 Sep 2009 21:43:01 +0000

Think of what broke the 40-year string of growing government and over-regulation created by the liberal Democrats in Congress. It was a 3rd party mentality that brought us Clinton in 1992 yet is was the Contract with America made (and later broken) that broke the string in 1994. We need to fix the GOP from within. We must choose our own candidates during the primaries and not leave it to the media to pick them for us. We need honest and truly conservative Republicans for the House, Senate, and Presidential races. Then we must focus money on their campaigns, not the GOP coffers. If you disagree, show me your 3rd party candidates that are viable for 2010?