How many of us cheered Harry Alford (BCC) on last week when he stood up to Barbara Boxer? He rightly accused her of wielding other minority groups (ex. NAACP) as weapons when she demanded their statements be entered into the record because they somehow represent diversity in the minority community. Mr. Alford blasted her with both barrels, as he rightly should.

In his ‘review’ of ‘Liberty & Tyranny’, Peter Berkowitz – and by extension all moderate conservatives – does essentially the same thing (Boxer to Alford) to true Conservatives. Only, in this instance, Berkowitz plays the part of the weapon as he is wielded by the larger confederation of neo-Conservatives. Mark Levin has called him out, and in doing so, has called out the entire cabal of those that play the part of the ‘good’, ‘reasonable’, and ‘moderate’ Conservative…the Peter Berkowitz’s, John McCain’s and the Joe Scarborough’s of the right. For those of us who take Liberty seriously, these soft, swishy Conservatives are tools of the Statist, advocating post-New Deal, post-Great Society acceptance and acquiescence. Whether they recognize it or not is of little consequence; they have chosen to turn a blind eye toward ‘Liberty & Tyranny’, preferring instead, to negotiate with the tyranny that has eroded and aims to destroy our foundation completely. Self-preservation may be one reason why they comprehend the true nature of the soft tyranny they appear to uphold…it’s either that, or shear stupidity. The Statist is a domestic terrorist in that he/she/they threaten the bedrock of our society. Do we wait until they have chiseled and blasted away all that grounds us – our traditions, our culture, our individualism, our religions, and our freedoms? How can you negotiate with that that seeks to destroy you? Civil discourse is desperately needed…and it should not begin with conceding points to the opposition, which is a sign of weakness and an inferior argument. Our greatest strength as a representative republic is that we get to select those that represent us. I would hope that before the next primary cycle, the moderates get on board with the true Conservatives within the framework of the Republican Party. The left loves to promote the ‘can’t we all just get along’ ideology. The answer is ‘NO, WE CAN’T.’ The Statist is our polar opposite; there is no compromise, there is no negotiation, there is no middle ground.

I am heartened that true Conservatives apparently recognize this – as evidenced by the huge disparity in attendance numbers at a recent local book signing in Huntington NY (Levin 6000 – Scarborough 300), and as further evidenced by the comments in the American Thinker, combined with the sales numbers of the ‘Liberty & Tyranny’ versus those of all other political authors.

On behalf of the world, get ‘Liberty & Tyranny’ translated. I believe this is the true reason for the silence in the MSM. Think of what the Statist stands to gain if ‘Liberty & Tyranny’ is contained within our shores.

While listening to a Gary Bower radio broadcast yesterday I was amused by how many conservative callers were slammed regarding their refusal to tolerate moderates such a McCain. Bower was partially right in stating that the reason that we have Obama is because conservatives, to the delight of Soros and the democrat majority, refuse to yield a hall-loaf in order to get the whole. He concludes that this is a right of center country and that we should support less so that we don’t lose everything. Bower went wrong by concentrating on the voter as the problem and not the Republican Party. While most conservatives and republicans despised McCain for his stance on immigration, kneecap and tax, free political speech, the TARP bailout and his position on interrogations most of us held our nose and voted defensively. However, McCain was such a poor choice that he needed Palin to provide any significant possible hopeful conservative legitimacy and to his day, after he has been forgotten, she is well remembered. The problem is not the voter; it is the Republican Party… it chose McCain. The Party may hope to mainstay moderates as an antidote for extreme leftists, campaigning that any republican is better than Obama because that is certainly true but it should also be clear that the democrats and the media so vilified moderate Bush that the cry for change gave us a president so liberal that he makes Europeans seem conservative. Although we easily could now play the opposite tune this is not the time to again offer moderation to defeat a Marxist; it is the time to offer free market capitalist solutions to take back a huge swath of lost territory. If we lost the last election because we offered a conservative alternative we would never stop hearing how we lost on the basis of conservatism and yet the facts reveal that we lost despite the fact that our candidate was so moderate that he received the blessing from the NYT’s. Despite this historical record some maintain the solution is that we now can win on moderation because a big government solution candidate proved he could win against the legacy of George Bush. Not so fast. If the democrats had offered a more moderate candidate they would have won by an even larger margin and if we had offered a more conservative candidate we would have either won or lost by a smaller margin. Obama won by five or so million votes and three million came from California. Most of this country is not like CA or NY. We now have a chance to defeat liberalism with conservatism. This is the time for real change and it must be done before the country gets hopelessly addicted to government dependency to the extent that change cannot be enacted. That is the current hope of the Obama Administration as he takes his cue from entrenched European styled socialist governments. He knows that he must take as many giant steps early on, before voters feel the pain. We don’t need a moderate to defeat this guy, nor will a moderate help America. We need founding principles, not to win, which we will anyway, but to make and keep America the Country she is and was designed to be.

I actually pity folks like Berkowitz, David Frum, Nancy Pelosi, Barney Frank, Harry Reid, and even BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, because of their arrogance, and self-imposed certitudes, they are just too damn stupid to understand the difference between the reality of natural law and freedom and marxist fascist statist theory thinking!! Hopefully they will all fade away into the twilight, and settle with the dust of forgotten idiots…….

What we’re seeing in society today is the result of years and years of the constant dripping water that is liberalism. When it comes right down to it, some people are just simply tired of the fight.

When making a decision to moderate, a person must admit to himself that he is wrong in some social respect. Levin points out this process like baby steps to statism.

Moderation is also reactionary. It puts the statist as the preeminent authority which the conservative must consult before governing.

The statist is Berkowitz’ mommy, therefore ‘boy’ is an appropriate term.