You want to know how this book would have received outstanding MSM coverage? Everyone would review it if it did not sell well. Fortunately that is not the case.

Is it too much to ask for someone in the MSM to do a real review of ‘Liberty & Tyranny’? I suspect they have all read it, hence the universal non-response. Are there no brave souls amongst their ranks who can string a few words and sentences together and parley? Or, is the selective mutism part of a much larger movement, as I am beginning to suspect? It takes a mighty hand to quiet the hawkers of media…a mighty, mighty hand.

The POTUS may be the reason behind those other authors sales – much like those authors who hawked anti-Bush tomes over the last eight years, but Mark Levin’s book is set apart – both in content and sheer volume of sales.

Maybe the left has a hard time comprehending large numbers…which would, now that I think about it, explain a lot.

Everyone who listens to the show knows that this book was supposed to be written before “Rescuing Sprite” yet even though it was delayed it was still very complete before the Obama election and was well on the way to printing before this current Administration took office. In fact many on this site, including myself, thought that Obama would not be President. That also goes for Limbaugh, ML’s friend. ML asked his audience early on, before Obama was even a candidate, before the primaries, if they would enjoy the writing of a book on conservatism. Conservatives like conservative books written by qualified conservatives.

Javers should especially praise the book because it so startlingly portrayed the character of this current Administration, even without the foreknowledge of the election results. And that is simply because Omaba is a generic, plain vanilla, straight up statist that takes his operational agenda from the previous 2000 years of similar persona and who, himself, deviates very little, if it at all, from many, many, historical predecessors.

Finding some outlandish comments on the forum is akin to finding some bluefish within a pod of sardines. Moreover his conclusion that a few people might wish to take up arms in a fashion comparable to our founding revolution is ridiculous. If such an event should ever occur the left, not conservatives, in this country would ignite it in a fashion similar to enviro movements and court decisions deemed unfavorable to their interests. A collapsing economy is more likely to ignite those that were promised what will never be delivered and such a scenario is likely to simply cause those who warned “I told you so “, to have to protect themselves. That is the “bunker mentality” of people such as Glen Beck; that is all there is to it and therefore, as such, deserves no further mischaracterization.

It was no accident that this current Administration is accurately characterized by “Liberty and Tyranny” because this is a book about conservatism and the Obama Administration represents a fascist ideology that even Newsweek described as such. What is an accident is that so many people were fooled into thinking that Obama would govern center left. If they still believe that maybe they should listen to the left leaning columnist Helen Thomas, who recently conveyed to the world her buyer’s remorse. Moreover the left continually misrepresents the facts and then defends the indefensible by shifting blame or denying culpability and this supposed “fair and balanced” interview is once again just another example of what we can expect from those who can’t tell the difference (don’t wish to) between a fact filled book and the current sorry state of America. One lie and faith will be believed by millions of people who then become immunized against a thousand rational facts, just because they are told to dislike the person who states them.

Javers is as likely to be convinced by ML as Iran and North Korea and other international tyrannical regimes are to be convinced by Obama despite the fact that he appears to love them. Obviously I can’t say the same for Javers, regarding ML, and that is why the interview conclusions are exactly what I would have expected.