<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama&#8217;s &#8216;energy czar&#8217; erased public records while Clinton&#8217;s EPA chief</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marklevinfan.com/2008/12/12/obamas-energy-czar-erased-public-records-while-clintons-epa-chief/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marklevinfan.com/2008/12/12/obamas-energy-czar-erased-public-records-while-clintons-epa-chief/</link>
	<description>Unofficial fan website for the Great One, Mark Levin!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:14:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: task</title>
		<link>http://marklevinfan.com/2008/12/12/obamas-energy-czar-erased-public-records-while-clintons-epa-chief/comment-page-1/#comment-43733</link>
		<dc:creator>task</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 22:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marklevinfan.com/?p=3984#comment-43733</guid>
		<description>Gee, a Clintonesta with contempt for the law and who deliberately disregards it. What a surprise! And the fact that Obama would have reason to recycle such a personality for his own administration is just as shocking considering we expected change that we could count on. I guess it depends on how you interpret the meaning of what Ã¢â‚¬Å“you can count onÃ¢â‚¬Â.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, a Clintonesta with contempt for the law and who deliberately disregards it. What a surprise! And the fact that Obama would have reason to recycle such a personality for his own administration is just as shocking considering we expected change that we could count on. I guess it depends on how you interpret the meaning of what Ã¢â‚¬Å“you can count onÃ¢â‚¬Â.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.828 seconds -->

