Comments on: Terrorists’ rights: Ronald Reagan vs John McCain http://marklevinfan.com/2008/02/06/terrorists-rights-ronald-reagan-vs-john-mccain/ Unofficial fan website for the Great One, Mark Levin! Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:14:10 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Rich http://marklevinfan.com/2008/02/06/terrorists-rights-ronald-reagan-vs-john-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-42041 Rich Wed, 06 Feb 2008 16:49:06 +0000 http://marklevinfan.com/?p=2541#comment-42041 These should be required reading for all: Sanctuary Part 1: http://www.ejectejecteject.com/archives/000125.html Sanctuary Part 2: http://www.ejectejecteject.com/archives/000126.html It's a long read, but very well worth it. These should be required reading for all:

Sanctuary Part 1: http://www.ejectejecteject.com/archives/000125.html

Sanctuary Part 2: http://www.ejectejecteject.com/archives/000126.html

It’s a long read, but very well worth it.

]]> By: task http://marklevinfan.com/2008/02/06/terrorists-rights-ronald-reagan-vs-john-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-42037 task Wed, 06 Feb 2008 13:05:53 +0000 http://marklevinfan.com/?p=2541#comment-42037 Yes indeed. Should such an event become law it addresses what the Constitution does not directly speak about so it would insure rights based upon that which is not clearly constitutionally stated. Actually it is to normal people. What is constitutionally addressed under habeas corpus and then again in the 5th Amendment is the clear language to deny such rights to Americans. You would think that if the language reads the way it does the Supreme morons would understand that Americans, a free people, were intended to have more, and not less, rights than any non-citizen let alone an enemy. Don’t bet on it. By virtue of legislation we prove we are guilty self-haters and the Supreme Court, under liberals, is out to prove it. Yes indeed. Should such an event become law it addresses what the Constitution does not directly speak about so it would insure rights based upon that which is not clearly constitutionally stated. Actually it is to normal people. What is constitutionally addressed under habeas corpus and then again in the 5th Amendment is the clear language to deny such rights to Americans. You would think that if the language reads the way it does the Supreme morons would understand that Americans, a free people, were intended to have more, and not less, rights than any non-citizen let alone an enemy. Don’t bet on it. By virtue of legislation we prove we are guilty self-haters and the Supreme Court, under liberals, is out to prove it.

]]>