<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maurice Hinchey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marklevinfan.com/2007/07/31/maurice-hinchey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marklevinfan.com/2007/07/31/maurice-hinchey/</link>
	<description>Unofficial fan website for the Great One, Mark Levin!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:56:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DubInDallas</title>
		<link>http://marklevinfan.com/2007/07/31/maurice-hinchey/comment-page-1/#comment-37691</link>
		<dc:creator>DubInDallas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 04:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marklevinfan.com/?p=2253#comment-37691</guid>
		<description>Thanks MLF for transcribing this interview- I know that that was a lot of work, and it was definitely worth it.  As gwilhelm56 said, it usually takes Libs 20 minutes to answer a straightforward question.  Libs fight dirty and they debate dirty. They are arrogant and they believe that the vast majority of the rest of us are too dumb to understand their inherent Libby goodness! One common technique is to wear out the attention-span of their listeners with well-rehearsed speciously-reasoned spiels that have the barest relation to the direct question that was posed to them.  Like Comrade Mo Hin Chee, they are always demanding that others &quot;let them finish!&quot;  When I hear a Lib say THAT, I tune them out and actually let them finish.  And when they finish, when they have completely unfolded to me their Libberish nonsense, I bid them goodbye.  Bye that time, I AM FINISHED with the Lib(s), and I don&#039;t want to ask them for any more time for me to be finished with my being finished with them!!  I don&#039;t want any more time with them, period!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks MLF for transcribing this interview- I know that that was a lot of work, and it was definitely worth it.  As gwilhelm56 said, it usually takes Libs 20 minutes to answer a straightforward question.  Libs fight dirty and they debate dirty. They are arrogant and they believe that the vast majority of the rest of us are too dumb to understand their inherent Libby goodness! One common technique is to wear out the attention-span of their listeners with well-rehearsed speciously-reasoned spiels that have the barest relation to the direct question that was posed to them.  Like Comrade Mo Hin Chee, they are always demanding that others &#8220;let them finish!&#8221;  When I hear a Lib say THAT, I tune them out and actually let them finish.  And when they finish, when they have completely unfolded to me their Libberish nonsense, I bid them goodbye.  Bye that time, I AM FINISHED with the Lib(s), and I don&#8217;t want to ask them for any more time for me to be finished with my being finished with them!!  I don&#8217;t want any more time with them, period!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ScottT</title>
		<link>http://marklevinfan.com/2007/07/31/maurice-hinchey/comment-page-1/#comment-37414</link>
		<dc:creator>ScottT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 17:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marklevinfan.com/?p=2253#comment-37414</guid>
		<description>In this case, I didn&#039;t find myself getting pissed at all.  I was too busy LAUGHING.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this case, I didn&#8217;t find myself getting pissed at all.  I was too busy LAUGHING.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gwilhelm56</title>
		<link>http://marklevinfan.com/2007/07/31/maurice-hinchey/comment-page-1/#comment-37382</link>
		<dc:creator>gwilhelm56</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 15:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marklevinfan.com/?p=2253#comment-37382</guid>
		<description>Yes that was the voice of Maurice Hinchey, or, Comrade MO HIN CHEE (as radio shows in his district refer to him,) He ran unopposed in his district and only managed to get approximately 63% of the vote. The same district electorate consistently votes for Ralph Nader to such a degree, that in 2004, John friggin Kerry came in SECOND.

As with most Stalinist Liberals, MO HIN CHEE usually takes 20 minutes to answer a question that most could answer with YES or NO!

MO HIN CHEE has in the past tried to concoct a scenario that President Bush did have something to do with 9/11.  He is also convinced that Karl Rove created and PLANTED the &quot;Rathergate&quot; Papers. 

Now, Comrade MO HIN CHEE owes me one pair of wireless Headphones, as about 9 minutes into this segment, I couldn&#039;t take it anymore and the said headphones kinda flew across the room.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes that was the voice of Maurice Hinchey, or, Comrade MO HIN CHEE (as radio shows in his district refer to him,) He ran unopposed in his district and only managed to get approximately 63% of the vote. The same district electorate consistently votes for Ralph Nader to such a degree, that in 2004, John friggin Kerry came in SECOND.</p>
<p>As with most Stalinist Liberals, MO HIN CHEE usually takes 20 minutes to answer a question that most could answer with YES or NO!</p>
<p>MO HIN CHEE has in the past tried to concoct a scenario that President Bush did have something to do with 9/11.  He is also convinced that Karl Rove created and PLANTED the &#8220;Rathergate&#8221; Papers. </p>
<p>Now, Comrade MO HIN CHEE owes me one pair of wireless Headphones, as about 9 minutes into this segment, I couldn&#8217;t take it anymore and the said headphones kinda flew across the room.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: donfrommanassas</title>
		<link>http://marklevinfan.com/2007/07/31/maurice-hinchey/comment-page-1/#comment-37379</link>
		<dc:creator>donfrommanassas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 14:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marklevinfan.com/?p=2253#comment-37379</guid>
		<description>Sgt Tim, I had to call Mike and have him confirm that was the real Hinchey. I was assured that the person TGO was batting around was indeed Congressman Hinchey. Hinchey reminded me of the scarecrow in the Wizard of Oz they both needed a brain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sgt Tim, I had to call Mike and have him confirm that was the real Hinchey. I was assured that the person TGO was batting around was indeed Congressman Hinchey. Hinchey reminded me of the scarecrow in the Wizard of Oz they both needed a brain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: task</title>
		<link>http://marklevinfan.com/2007/07/31/maurice-hinchey/comment-page-1/#comment-37376</link>
		<dc:creator>task</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 13:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marklevinfan.com/?p=2253#comment-37376</guid>
		<description>Maurice knows that the FCC regulates the airways and is not designed to control free speech. The Fairness Doctrine was designed to allow opportunity for others to speak when there were precious few radio stations. In fact there was no FM. At one time we had party telephone lines and operators would interrupt conversations so as to permit other callers to use the line. Today can you imagine not having your own private phone line? Likewise there is a plethora of radio frequencies and stations for the left to spew their boring, flat, bland, plain vanilla socialistic agenda. 

He is for working people? Most of us work. IsnÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t he also for those who donÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t work? In reality he is for some of the working people and all of the people who donÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t work. He should be for all Americans and I mean American citizens. I would bet he is for illegal rights and terrorist rights as well. In reality he is for redistribution and taxation by envy. He is for more aggressive and progressive taxes targeting risk takers and AmericaÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s entrepreneurial successes. He is for open borders, socialized medicine; larger one size fits all, government. He is a socialist and in the process of establishing that agenda he also belies human freedom and liberty all along the way.

He articulates the need for more and larger government. A government large enough to give you everything is large enough to take it all away. He criticizes Bush for the Patriot Act when that has an automatic sunset that mandates re-authorization. There are still blue laws on the books. Government takes away property, speech, guns, income, choice etc. It doesn&#039;t give them back after these statutes and laws are enacted. The founding fathers knew that.  He, as usual for the left, can&#039;t get a toehold on the Constitution. He is for censor. Where does federal law nullify and supersede the Constitution? Sure he can censor because it is nothing more than a political propaganda stunt. It is in effect free speech carrying no weight other than to stimulate public sentiment and diminish the Executive Branch. DoesnÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t he realize he is hurting his own government? I would guess he does which means that he doesnÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t like his government.  That is because he is a lib. That alone gives him away   If Conservatives were to interpret the 2nd Amendment the way the libs interpret what they like, every man, women and child would be issued a gun at birth. He never was clear on how he feels about the 2nd Amendment but like most libs, in an elite position, he got his license while closing the door on everyone else.

Now i bet he reads this so as to better prepare the disguise he employs on his next interview.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maurice knows that the FCC regulates the airways and is not designed to control free speech. The Fairness Doctrine was designed to allow opportunity for others to speak when there were precious few radio stations. In fact there was no FM. At one time we had party telephone lines and operators would interrupt conversations so as to permit other callers to use the line. Today can you imagine not having your own private phone line? Likewise there is a plethora of radio frequencies and stations for the left to spew their boring, flat, bland, plain vanilla socialistic agenda. </p>
<p>He is for working people? Most of us work. IsnÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t he also for those who donÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t work? In reality he is for some of the working people and all of the people who donÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t work. He should be for all Americans and I mean American citizens. I would bet he is for illegal rights and terrorist rights as well. In reality he is for redistribution and taxation by envy. He is for more aggressive and progressive taxes targeting risk takers and AmericaÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s entrepreneurial successes. He is for open borders, socialized medicine; larger one size fits all, government. He is a socialist and in the process of establishing that agenda he also belies human freedom and liberty all along the way.</p>
<p>He articulates the need for more and larger government. A government large enough to give you everything is large enough to take it all away. He criticizes Bush for the Patriot Act when that has an automatic sunset that mandates re-authorization. There are still blue laws on the books. Government takes away property, speech, guns, income, choice etc. It doesn&#8217;t give them back after these statutes and laws are enacted. The founding fathers knew that.  He, as usual for the left, can&#8217;t get a toehold on the Constitution. He is for censor. Where does federal law nullify and supersede the Constitution? Sure he can censor because it is nothing more than a political propaganda stunt. It is in effect free speech carrying no weight other than to stimulate public sentiment and diminish the Executive Branch. DoesnÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t he realize he is hurting his own government? I would guess he does which means that he doesnÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t like his government.  That is because he is a lib. That alone gives him away   If Conservatives were to interpret the 2nd Amendment the way the libs interpret what they like, every man, women and child would be issued a gun at birth. He never was clear on how he feels about the 2nd Amendment but like most libs, in an elite position, he got his license while closing the door on everyone else.</p>
<p>Now i bet he reads this so as to better prepare the disguise he employs on his next interview.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Golem14</title>
		<link>http://marklevinfan.com/2007/07/31/maurice-hinchey/comment-page-1/#comment-37363</link>
		<dc:creator>Golem14</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 10:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marklevinfan.com/?p=2253#comment-37363</guid>
		<description>Kudos to Mark for putting up with Hinchey. After the way that guy went on, I wouldn&#039;t trust him even if he WEREN&#039;T a politician.

(Anti-spam word: &quot;compost&quot;. Yep.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudos to Mark for putting up with Hinchey. After the way that guy went on, I wouldn&#8217;t trust him even if he WEREN&#8217;T a politician.</p>
<p>(Anti-spam word: &#8220;compost&#8221;. Yep.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sgt Tim</title>
		<link>http://marklevinfan.com/2007/07/31/maurice-hinchey/comment-page-1/#comment-37362</link>
		<dc:creator>Sgt Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 08:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marklevinfan.com/?p=2253#comment-37362</guid>
		<description>LOL

If that really was Maurice Hinchey, what the heck were the people of his district thinking electing and reelecting such a dim bulb?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL</p>
<p>If that really was Maurice Hinchey, what the heck were the people of his district thinking electing and reelecting such a dim bulb?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ScottT</title>
		<link>http://marklevinfan.com/2007/07/31/maurice-hinchey/comment-page-1/#comment-37353</link>
		<dc:creator>ScottT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 04:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marklevinfan.com/?p=2253#comment-37353</guid>
		<description>WOW!!  THAT, my friends, is GOOD RADIO!

&quot;Mo-Hinch&quot; is a MORON.  

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW!!  THAT, my friends, is GOOD RADIO!</p>
<p>&#8220;Mo-Hinch&#8221; is a MORON.  </p>
<p>LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John in Dublin</title>
		<link>http://marklevinfan.com/2007/07/31/maurice-hinchey/comment-page-1/#comment-37349</link>
		<dc:creator>John in Dublin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 04:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marklevinfan.com/?p=2253#comment-37349</guid>
		<description>Maurice made a fool of himself.  But libs usually do that very well...

BTW, Maurice, it is the demonCRAP party.  Get it straight you damned fool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maurice made a fool of himself.  But libs usually do that very well&#8230;</p>
<p>BTW, Maurice, it is the demonCRAP party.  Get it straight you damned fool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saxmachine</title>
		<link>http://marklevinfan.com/2007/07/31/maurice-hinchey/comment-page-1/#comment-37347</link>
		<dc:creator>saxmachine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 00:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marklevinfan.com/?p=2253#comment-37347</guid>
		<description>Good of this guy to show up for a proper whupin, too bad we can&#039;t get any of the &quot;Leaders&quot; of the commiecrat (or is it commiecratic?) party to join our champ in the octagon. 

Hoo Rah Mark, show those punks who pays their salaries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good of this guy to show up for a proper whupin, too bad we can&#8217;t get any of the &#8220;Leaders&#8221; of the commiecrat (or is it commiecratic?) party to join our champ in the octagon. </p>
<p>Hoo Rah Mark, show those punks who pays their salaries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.662 seconds -->

