Weiner Nation Song

by @ 11:47 pm on June 30, 2007. Filed under Mark Levin Audio

Friday, Mark started his show with some music! LOL!

Oh, do you remember this version from a couple years ago?

25 Responses to “Weiner Nation Song”

  1. ScottT says:

    Aaah yes……it’s been a while, but Mark finally gives us a bi-monthly “Bash The Weiner” fix. BEAUTIFUL! (thanks for posting it, MLF; I missed it on the radio).

    By the way……did anybody else hear what that scumbag did on his website recently?? I was watching O’Reilly’s show, and he reported that Weiner had the dispicable, vulgar temerity to post pictures of dead U.S. soldiers (apparently for “shock” value). I guess this is the way he shows us how much he “loves” them (you know, the same way pukes like Rosie O’Donnell & Rocky Anderson “love” them!)

    Apparently, he had to be contacted by the military, who requested he take the pics down so as not to make it any harder on the families than it already was. Then, even AFTER the request was made, he kept them posted for another 24 hours before taking them down.

    Can you BELIEVE this creep?? I can’t imagine what the zombies who actually LIKE this phony despot are smoking. Unbelievable!

    Yeah, that Weiner really, REALLY “cares” about the troops. What a piece of sh*t!

  2. StevetheConservative says:

    I was laughing during this segment. It was funny to hear Mark play the Oscar Mayer Weiner song in English and Spanish as well as hearing Walking Around in Women’s Underwear again. All just to spite Weiner since he went on vacation while we were surging against our pro Amnesty senators. Rush went on vacation that same week but the difference between the two was Rush credited the American people for defeating the Amnesty bill while Weiner decided to credit himself for the defeat.

    Then Weiner whined and moaned when his Free Speech award video wasn’t aired on C-SPAN and he encourages a surge on Brian Lamb and C-SPAN just because they did not air his video for an award he did not show up for (Weiner did not show up for his Talkers Magazine Free Speech Award but instead created a video for his speech).

    I watched a video on Youtube where Brian Lamb read the e-mails and all I have to say is I feel sorry for Brian Lamb for being attacked by Weiner’s fans.

    (Funny thing is when I am typing this comment, my anti-spam word is “Weiner”)

  3. joe says:

    . . . while Weiner decided to credit himself for the defeat.
    That’s not true.

    And remember Mike’s on the air 15 hours a week while Mark’s on 10.

  4. ScottT says:

    Hey joe, what’s your point? The fact that Mark kicks Weiner’s ass even though he’s on 5 hours per week less??

    I AGREE!

    And it gets WORSE, joe: eventually, Mark will be on MORE stations than Weiner, and will likely have a three-hour block of his own. He’s already thumping your subversive-leftist hero every quarterly arbitron rating period during the two-hour time frame they’re both on the air.

    Pity, ain’t it, joe?? Hehehe!

  5. DrWhoFan65 says:

    Quality, Joe, not quantity! Doubt the weiner plays ‘Women’s Underwear’ (except at home), the anthems of the Armed Forces, God Bless America, America the Beautiful, etc…too busy screaming, I’m told. I wouldn’t listen to the guy at gunpoint. No offense to YOU, mind you.

  6. DubInDallas says:

    I was heartened to hear that Mark Levin has now usurped Weiner in the Seattle market!! Weiner now has been eclipsed in at least one market, and I think that this is only the beginning! Go Mark! Roast Weiner!

  7. joe says:

    Isn’t Mark Mike and Mike Mark? They do they same schtick.

  8. ScottT says:

    “Schtick” implies “act”, joe. Your pal Weiner is 100% ACT.

    That’s why he’ll never put a dent in guys like Sean, Mark & Rush. They’re the REAL deal. Your guy is a fake who hates his own country & tries to damage our military with his sick propoganda.

  9. bob says:

    I don’t think Savage is 100% act. He has donated $25,000 to defend Col. Chessani, a story that was covered on WND.com.

    He does have his good days, though. And the fact that he has been blacklisted from FOX gives more fodder to Levin to say that Savage is just a nut. In fact, though, Savage is never on FOX because he has speaks frequently on the media monopoly that Murdoch has – FOXNews, HarperCollins, the New York Post, and dozens more.

    I will revoke and take back this post when Savage self-combusts on the air, and when Levin takes Savage’s spot on KPRC from 5-8PM. Until then, Savage is still Number 3 in the American radio landscape.

    And by the way, Levin isn’t even heard in Philly, the 6th largest market in the country.

    http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=56410

    MEDIA MONOPOLY: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/News_Corporation#Holdings

  10. joe says:

    They all say they first want to entertain then inform.

  11. DubInDallas says:

    What Mark said is that Liberal Radio failed because they were so intent upon their negative hate-America doom-and-gloom disinformation that they failed utterly as entertainment. (And they failed the American people as sources of information, as well!!) Lib Radio failed because they failed to entertain, and their “information” was negative, angry, and false! They DESERVE to fail, both on the radio and also in their political endeavors!!

  12. ScottT says:

    Exactly, joe. That is why the “big three” kick your hero’s ass: they entertain AND inform.

    Weiner “entertains” (if that’s what you call undermining the military, attacking REAL conservatives & spewing conspiracy theories).

    But he doesn’t inform.

    Dub is right: “Angry” liberal radio is a proven failure. Weiner is becoming more associated with it each day.

    The clock is ticking, joe. Weiner’s days of relevancy are numbered.

  13. ScottT says:

    Hey bob,

    Mark Levin has been nationally syndicated for a very short period of time. At his current pace, he will likely usurp Weiner in fairly short order. He already beats him in the arbitron ratings every quarter. Give him another 18-24 months, and he’ll have Weiner buried in terms of total stations as well. That’s what drives Weiner nuts—-he’s hit his ceiling with his tiresome “everyone-sucks-except-me” act, and he knows he’ll never make it against the guys who REALLY matter.

    As for his donating money to “defend” Col. Chessani…….Weiner only does that when he wants to either embarrass the military or con people into believing he’s authentically “supporting” a cause. The fact is, he’s tried to pull the same stunt in the past. When he claimed to be “defending” Lt. Pantano a couple of years ago, he made a complete ass out of himself trying to convince people that he was the only guy reporting the story (which was TOTAL bullsh*t). But as soon as Pantano was cleared & didn’t publicly kiss Weiner’s ass, Weiner threw HIM under the bus! I heard him do it on the air with my own ears.

    Weiner has no loyalties to anybody but HIMSELF. Any attempts he makes to get people to believe otherwise are nothing but con jobs. And any money he may spend trying to justify it is purely a self-serving “investment” to try and get a headline.

    The guy is a pathetic shill with less integrity than Morton Downey Jr.

  14. joe says:

    The simple truth is no Mike no Mark.

  15. ScottT says:

    Yah, right joe.

    That’s like saying, “no Paris Hilton, no Margaret Thatcher”.

  16. StevetheConservative says:

    Hey bob

    If you believe that Weiner being blacklisted from Fox gives Mark more ammo to call him a mental patient, how do you explain this response when Weiner was blacklisted?

    http://marklevinfan.com/?p=1294

    Also Weiner claimed that he was set up and was provoked when he told a caller on his short lived TV show to “Get AIDS and die”. This video shows that he wasn’t provoked when he made the comment.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sdtw-WDSzzI

    Weiner speaks out against the Fairness Doctrine but he gives the libs an excuse for it.

    And it will be a matter of time until Mark takes Weiner’s live slot on KPRC.

    Oh and bob, the real media monopoly is the lib media not the media outlets Weiner is talking about.

  17. bob says:

    Point-by-point reply:

    1) Monopoly: and your point is…? Why do you think Roger Ailes hates him? Because he speaks out against Murdoch’s big monopoly, that’s why! And yes, the libs have gigantic monopolies as well. But how do you explain this:

    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/05/09/politics/main1600694.shtml

    2) TV show: fair point. He’s better on radio anyway. Bombastic-ness makes for interesting radio.

    3) Fairness doctrine: he is no more conservative/liberal in WHAT HE SAYS ON RADIO than Rush, Sean, or Mark. What is different is his style of saying it, mostly using hyperbole to make a point.

    That’s all. And thank me.

  18. ScottT says:

    Dead wrong on #3, bob (that Weiner is “no more liberal than Rush, Sean or Mark)…..unless you’re basically ADMITTING what most of us already know: that Weiner has made a living on radio of LYING about himself.

    If not, explain to me why he supported/donated to/voted for a moonbat leftist for Attorney General for the state of California when there was a rock-solid conservative running on the ballot.

    Explain why he lied about all his pre-1980 “activities” involving hard-line communist leftists in North Beach, Fiji, and the Hawaiian Islands before he ever thought about using “conservatism” to make a living.

    Explain why he throws down with the moonbats with conspiracy theories like “Rummy helped Saddam murder thousands” and “Cheney is on board for the Iraq war for Haliburton”.

    Explain why he thinks it’s just hunkee-doree for Nancy Pelosi to thumb her nose at the White House & go to Damascus to break bread with that terrorist prick while Algazeera watches & reports.

    I could go on & on, bob. But what’s the point? Apparently your mind is made up that this dirt bag is a “good conservative”.

    Whatever, dude.

  19. ScottT says:

    Here ya go, everyone—-check out this sampling of “intelligent” listeners of “Weiner Nation”. Hysterical!!

  20. jdpen74 says:

    LOL ScottT

    Watch this one and tell me weiner isn’t all about the “show”… The first 15 seconds is enough, really. Seriously, he is more pathetic the wiser I get.

  21. joe says:

    Mike brings his dog to the station Mark does the same. Mark’s liberal guy’s voice sounds like Mike’s. Mark hate Pelosi Mike hates Boxer and they both hate Hillary.

  22. ScottT says:

    “Mike breathes oxygen Mark does the same. Mike has a radio show and so does Mark. Mark likes Pepsi Mike likes Coke and they both walk on two feet”.

    joe, your “arguments” are almost as pointless as Weiner’s.

  23. DrWhoFan65 says:

    No kidding…talk about comparing apples and oranges. No Weiner, no Mark? Cripes…it doesn’t bother me all that much that he’s out there (except to the extent that the Dems can point at him as a supposed conservative, which he is NOT); and he’s welcome to whatever audience he can muster. But he’s not even CLOSE to Mark. Thank me!

  24. DubInDallas says:

    Right on, my brethren!! Roast Weiner!!

  25. StevetheConservative says:

    Stating that Mark couldn’t exist without Weiner is absurd. On Mark’s show on Monday, Mark stated that the person who influenced him the most for having a career in radio was conservative talk show host, Bob Grant. After all, Mark’s “Get off the phone ya big dope!” dismissal line was inspired from Grant’s “Get off my phone!” dismissal line to lib callers. Weiner never used such a line on his pseudo conservative radio show. Also, Grant was the first angry conservative talk show host, not Weiner. Also, Sean Hannity was influenced by Grant as well. Weiner was never influenced by Bob Grant in any way whatsoever.

    So here is the proper saying to sum up Mark’s and Sean’s existence on the radio: No Bob Grant, no Mark and Sean.

    This interview is the definite proof.

    http://marklevinfan.com/?p=1464

[Mark Levin Fan is proudly powered by WordPress.]