Comments on: Bush-Kennedy immigration deal

By: saxmachine

saxmachine — Sun, 20 May 2007 18:43:49 +0000

Not much I can do in my congressional district here in NY, we have John “Gus Jr.” Hall as our congressman and you all know of the excrement we sent to the Senate. I do hope that any of you with reasonable American representation have been in contact with them on a regular basis, my calls to Chuck, Hill, and Gus Jr. have and probably will fall on deaf ears.

By: JFKDEMFAN

JFKDEMFAN — Sun, 20 May 2007 00:50:43 +0000

I miss my “Cowboy”. BUU-HUU-HUU!!

http://www.marklevinfan.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3450&start=0&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight=

By: JFKDEMFAN

JFKDEMFAN — Sun, 20 May 2007 00:24:22 +0000

4 year old celebrating “SCAMNESTY” “flips” Tammy Bruce “the finger” @ a Home Depot on Thursday. Well now isn’t he CUTE?? RAH-RAH!!KENNEDY & ilk. This is the new generation of “Americans” you are inviting as guests to our Country?? GRRRRRR!! (I would dip his little finger in lysol if he were mine!!)

By: task

task — Sat, 19 May 2007 12:46:16 +0000

I would assume that most of you are like me. This has screwed up the way I sleep, the way I eat, the way I work and the way I recreate.

By: task

task — Sat, 19 May 2007 12:37:36 +0000

At this moment I am in NYC. I Have conversations with my wifeÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s relatives about these issues. They get their talking points from the local Starbucks. They live in a microcosm. They have no idea that the rest of the Country does not think the way New Yorkers do. Likewise the Senate works in the Beltway that is dominated by the MSM. They go to parties where their wives socialize among each other. They are a Club and they think of themselves as a Brotherhood. They are elected for six year, not two. In effect they become insiders much like McCain. Objectivism is incrementally lost. They become something different than their roots would suggest.

Ever notice how Supreme Court Justices change their ideology. Where did they move to? Who do their wives socialize with? Scalia gets into a motor home, takes his family and leaves Washington for the summer. Knowingly or unknowingly he vaccinates himself from that climate.

By: DrWhoFan65

DrWhoFan65 — Sat, 19 May 2007 11:08:55 +0000

That last line is a bit much, but I generally agree. Let us hope (and try to give power to the possibility) that enough members of Congress on the GOP side want to keep their jobs that this won’t fly. 41 senators can filibuster. Nazi Pukelousy wants 70 GOP votes (imagine THAT!) before it’ll allow it brought to the floor.

Keep the heat turned up-that’s the ticket here, as long as the dhimmis run that hellhole! It’ll be bad enough if NOTHING is done, but infinitely worse if we let em push this abomination through. If they do manage to, we can forget a Republican majority ever again, much less a conservative one. Why the HELL don’t they GET that?!?

By: task

task — Sat, 19 May 2007 10:44:31 +0000

John Ashcroft is a Christian. Previously IÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢ve described Bush as a pragmatic altruist. The difference between the two is that Ashcroft was first an AG and second was a Christian. The opposite holds true for Bush as President. He took an oath to uphold our laws, as did all of Congress I might add. That is the job description. More than that he has an obligation to his base. You might remember that after the 2004 election he informed Congress that he had political capital and he was going to use it. We gave him that capital only because we believed that he believed in us. Now he stands at a crossroads where his signature may very well destroy the party of the good and hard working people that trusted him, so that our future voices will forever be silenced.

Everything that we have strived to protectÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚Â¦ freedom and liberty, gun rights, free speech, the right to life, lower taxes, State’s rights, medical choices, property ownership rights are all instantly at stake. It is as though you woke up one morning and found yourself occupied by a foreign power. As history as so frequently shown usÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚Â¦ we cannot lose this Country in battle but we can lose it from within.

I would expect more from Judas Iscariot.

By: ScottT

ScottT — Sat, 19 May 2007 03:20:46 +0000

DrWho, I was just going by the fact that you said you didn’t “believe” there were adequate grounds for impeachment. In fact, there ARE no such grounds. I understand what you’re saying, though.

Dub, I feel your pain!

By: DrWhoFan65

DrWhoFan65 — Sat, 19 May 2007 03:06:35 +0000

Actually, I’m not advocating impeachment at all; I said that I’m not sure I’d be all that sorry to see it happen. And I didn’t mean to suggest that it’s warranted because of the illegals issue (or any OTHER grounds the dhimmis talk about).

If I were a member of the House, I would NOT vote in favor of impeachment.

I hope I’ve clarified my earlier comment.

By: ScottT

ScottT — Sat, 19 May 2007 02:59:57 +0000

DrWho, if you’d consider “impeaching” President Bush for this bill…..then you’d have to give equal cosideration to whether or not “impeachment” would’ve been warranted for President Reagan in 1986. Frankly, I wouldn’t TOUCH that topic for a whole bunch of reasons…….but they’re EQUALLY culpable for the mess we have.

You can’t “impeach” the last 40 years of our governent & executive branches. As far as I’m concerned, what’s good for one is good for ALL.