Wednesday, Mark read from a post on National Review Online by Cliff May.
From an interview with Pierre Rehov, a French documentary maker whose newest film, Suicide Killers, is based on interviews that he conducted with the families of suicide bombers and would-be bombers.
That was a very revealing interview and sounds like Suicide Killers is an amazing documentary!
.jpg)
Maybe if they knew that their families would soon follow them to the hereafter, they might have second thoughts about blowing up cafes and school buses. But then, we’re to kind and gentle to threaten that, and they know it.
Sax,
I dont know about that. When you have a mother who is willing to use her own baby as a diversion in order to kill, I really dont think their way of life comes across as a loving family.
Part of the plan for the mass suicide bombings of planes over the Atlantic was that whole families, babies included, would travel together. The bombers would murder their own children along with a plane full of innocent adults and children. With this type of mentality, and indifference to the pain and death off their own Moslem babies, it is not hard to imagine a ‘mother’ who feels it an ‘honor’ that a child dies a horrible death and kills another woman’s child also.
Knowing their families will join them in death phases them not because they believe the first to go secures a place in paradise for the whole family. They even believe they will already be there when the homicide bomber gets there. Don’t ask me how that happens. This sounds more like a child’s magical thinking than a religion
Twins, that’s an interesting observation “(The family) even believe they will already be there when the homicide bomber gets there.” Having a homicide bomber relative in Islamo-paradise is kind of like an anchor baby in the US, eh? The whole family has a free ticket and everlasting ‘rights’.
Perfect Nana! I never thought of the anchor baby/bomber comparison. You have a great mind my friend