Howard Dean didn’t just not win in Iowa, he placed third and promptly decided to make common cause with Yassir Arafat(?!). Note that in the color-coded world of Palestinian terrorism, the black and white kaffiya (that scarf around Dean’s neck) signifies allegience to Al Fatah and Yassir Arafat.
As the Great One pointed out, Howard Dean did not speak out against former President Clinton’s many meetings with Yassir Arafat. And then there is this:
In a 1998 television interview, Dean conceded the radical Islamic Palestinian group known as Hamas is “a terrorist organization.” But he added that he believed that the rise of Hamas to power in the West Bank and Gaza after Yasser Arafat leaves the scene could be a “good” thing.
Here’s how MSNBC.com reported the story: “In another January 1998 episode, he [Dean] also speculated that there ‘will probably be good and bad’ if Hamas takes control over the Palestinian leadership. Yasser Arafat, he said, ‘is going to leave the scene….When that happens, I think Hamas will probably take over. There will probably be good and bad out of that. The bad, of course, is that Hamas is a terrorist organization. However, if they have to run a quasi-state they may actually have to be more responsible and start negotiations. So who knows what will happen.’”
So much for Dr. Dean’s lectures about negotiating with terrorists and others not denouncing them.
Hannity looks nicer in person
.jpg)
So Dr. Dimento wants to call Prime Minister Malaki an anti semite but yet thinks Hamas taking over is a “good thing”? See what happens when you don’t take your medication Dr?
This is the problem with Moe Howard Dean and the rest of the hardcore lib/Dems and RINOs.
I believe that they think that by tying the hands of Pres Bush, by giving rights to the low life, mold and mildew, toilet bowl water drinking terrorists, if the Dems come back into power, they can say to the terrorists: “See now, we were nice to you, interfered with Pres Bush every way possible, bestowed Constitutional Rights on you, condemned the war (but of course we just HAD to support our troops), now you should be appreciative of what we did and give us Dems a break now that we are back in power. Cut down on the terrorism and give us a break.”
The RINOs probably feel that the Dems will come back into power, therefore, they better go along with the Dems, and hope for a political Scooby snack after the elections.
Durka Durka Mohammed Jihad,
Shirpa Shirpa Bak Allah.
And I will have a side order of fries to go.
Thank me!
The Democrat loons on the left got their hemroids in an uproar because the Prime Minister of Iraq will not condemn Hezbollah and Hamas and call them a terrorists organization? Although I would feel better about the man if he did, you would think the libs would be happy that the Prime Minister is following their lead. When was the last time a lib came out a publicly denounced terrorists?
The Prime Minister of Iraq has to play a delicate balancing game, and if he doesn’t want to get assassinated real quick, he probably does have to avoid saying too much on that particular subject.
Dean says we don’t need to pay to secure democracy for Iraq because Maliki will not condemn Hezbollah. Perhaps we as taxpayers need not pay the salary of the 7 dems who refused to do the very same thing.
I would love to hear Scream’s explanation of the picture and his previous statements that we cannot choose sides in Israel’s struggle ( the struggle part being my own words of course)