Comments on: The Outrage of Hamdan http://marklevinfan.com/2006/06/29/the-outrage-of-hamdan/ Unofficial fan website for the Great One, Mark Levin! Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:50:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: The False Dervish http://marklevinfan.com/2006/06/29/the-outrage-of-hamdan/comment-page-1/#comment-5929 The False Dervish Sat, 01 Jul 2006 15:26:22 +0000 http://marklevinfan.com/?p=1224#comment-5929 The Supreme Court for Infite Jihad is the final word in Constitutional Law. Indeed, all statutes and even the rules and regulations that govt agencies (USDA, FCC, etc) operate within the confines of the Constitution. The President had better STOP being intimidated and START talking to his cabinate (if some of them can be trusted) and begin to invoke Checks and Balances. The Supreme Court for Infite Jihad is the final word in Constitutional Law. Indeed, all statutes and even the rules and regulations that govt agencies (USDA, FCC, etc) operate within the confines of the Constitution.

The President had better STOP being intimidated and START talking to his cabinate (if some of them can be trusted) and begin to invoke Checks and Balances.

]]> By: betsyross1776 http://marklevinfan.com/2006/06/29/the-outrage-of-hamdan/comment-page-1/#comment-5913 betsyross1776 Fri, 30 Jun 2006 22:11:24 +0000 http://marklevinfan.com/?p=1224#comment-5913 Look this has gone on since the history of this nation began. Now Mark is talkin my lingo , the court has been wrong before. FDR went to battle with the courts during ww2. He was going to disband the court , no body teaches that though . The court is not always right and can be over turned. Look this has gone on since the history of this nation began. Now Mark is talkin my lingo , the court has been wrong before. FDR went to battle with the courts during ww2. He was going to disband the court , no body teaches that though . The court is not always right and can be over turned.

]]> By: saxmachine http://marklevinfan.com/2006/06/29/the-outrage-of-hamdan/comment-page-1/#comment-5902 saxmachine Fri, 30 Jun 2006 12:19:16 +0000 http://marklevinfan.com/?p=1224#comment-5902 And to hear the libs talk about this, you'd think we just gave voting rights to an oppressed downtrodden people. These mutts don't need a day in court, they need an eternity in hell. I for one hope that the millitary takes up a no prisoners pollicy. And to hear the libs talk about this, you’d think we just gave voting rights to an oppressed downtrodden people. These mutts don’t need a day in court, they need an eternity in hell. I for one hope that the millitary takes up a no prisoners pollicy.

]]> By: Sunny http://marklevinfan.com/2006/06/29/the-outrage-of-hamdan/comment-page-1/#comment-5897 Sunny Fri, 30 Jun 2006 03:48:55 +0000 http://marklevinfan.com/?p=1224#comment-5897 "The court ruled 5-to-3 Thursday that Mr. Bush acted outside his authority when he ordered Al Qaeda suspects to stand trial before these specially organized military commissions. The ruling said that the commission process at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, could not proceed without violating US military law and provisions of the Geneva Conventions. "The commission lacks power to proceed," writes Justice John Paul Stevens for the court majority." http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0630/p01s01-usju.html FOCUS on "..and provisions of the Geneva Conventions.." The 5 SCOTUS sell-outs ignored Article 4 of the Geneva convention, which Mark Levin provided. Just to reiterate it, and put it in a nutshell. “The court ruled 5-to-3 Thursday that Mr. Bush acted outside his authority when he ordered Al Qaeda suspects to stand trial before these specially organized military commissions. The ruling said that the commission process at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, could not proceed without violating US military law and provisions of the Geneva Conventions. “The commission lacks power to proceed,” writes Justice John Paul Stevens for the court majority.”

http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0630/p01s01-usju.html

FOCUS on “..and provisions of the Geneva Conventions..” The 5 SCOTUS sell-outs ignored Article 4 of the Geneva convention, which Mark Levin provided.

Just to reiterate it, and put it in a nutshell.

]]> By: Sunny http://marklevinfan.com/2006/06/29/the-outrage-of-hamdan/comment-page-1/#comment-5896 Sunny Fri, 30 Jun 2006 03:45:53 +0000 http://marklevinfan.com/?p=1224#comment-5896 Good thoughts, False Dervish! Good thoughts, False Dervish!

]]> By: The False Dervish http://marklevinfan.com/2006/06/29/the-outrage-of-hamdan/comment-page-1/#comment-5880 The False Dervish Thu, 29 Jun 2006 20:21:09 +0000 http://marklevinfan.com/?p=1224#comment-5880 OH, YEAH....AND GOES DOUBLE FOR THE DAMN SENATE! OH, YEAH….AND GOES DOUBLE FOR THE DAMN SENATE!

]]> By: The False Dervish http://marklevinfan.com/2006/06/29/the-outrage-of-hamdan/comment-page-1/#comment-5879 The False Dervish Thu, 29 Jun 2006 20:19:33 +0000 http://marklevinfan.com/?p=1224#comment-5879 President Roosevelt did not have to get Supreme Court rulings to deal with the trials of the Nazi and the Japanese after WW II. Someone please explain to me why President Bush had to wait for the Supreme Court of the Infite Jihad to make a ruling? Since when does the Supreme Court have a saying during wartime? Will bail be posted for the terrorists? And where will they roam once released? Clearly, too many elements in the govt itself do not want us to succeed because it will be interpreted as a sole victory for Pres Bush. IT IS TIME FOR PRESIDENT BUSH TO SHOW SOME PRESIDENTIAL BALLS AND TELL THE SUPREME COURT TO MIND ITS OWN DAMN LEGAL BUSINESS AS INDICATED IN THE US CONSTITUTION, ET AL. President Roosevelt did not have to get Supreme Court rulings to deal with the trials of the Nazi and the Japanese after WW II. Someone please explain to me why President Bush had to wait for the Supreme Court of the Infite Jihad to make a ruling? Since when does the Supreme Court have a saying during wartime?

Will bail be posted for the terrorists? And where will they roam once released?

Clearly, too many elements in the govt itself do not want us to succeed because it will be interpreted as a sole victory for Pres Bush.

IT IS TIME FOR PRESIDENT BUSH TO SHOW SOME PRESIDENTIAL BALLS AND TELL THE SUPREME COURT TO MIND ITS OWN DAMN LEGAL BUSINESS AS INDICATED IN THE US CONSTITUTION, ET AL.

]]>