God bless Rush and all of our conservative, patriotic icons who speak out so untiringly to get the truth out there to counter the BS from the liberal hordes. As far as the “Fairness” Doctrine is concerned, I think any attempt to bring that back would warrant a march on Washington by those of us who know how devastating that would be for this country!

The reason for this is that the speaker can read uninterruptedly from the facial expressions of his audience the precise moments when he is “losing” the audience- and also the moments when he is “winning” the audience.

The writer of any newpaper cannot see his readers either when he is writing or when the readers are reading. Most people in the world are very lazy within themselves, and they are unlikely to take up and read anything with which they already know that they will disagree.

When Rush Limbaugh is broadcasting, he has official program observers, and when one of them has an expression that shows that he is “losing” them, Rush then knows that there are thousands of other people out there who are experiencing the same feeling as the observer is feeling. And so then we get Rush’s typical:”What?! What Mr. Snerdley?” And then Rush catches Mr. Snerdley up on whatever it was.

By this ingeniously simple technique, Rush Limbaugh retains tens of millions of dedicated listeners every week.

This was not possible before the “Fairness Doctrine” was repealed under the Reagan administration. And now the Liberals- knowing that they are beaten on the radio- now the Liberals are agitating for the reinstatement of the “Fairness Doctrine”- they think that it is “unfair” that Limbaugh and Hannity and Levin can command the respectful attentiveness of tens of millions every single week on the radio.

And we Conservatives must fight these dastardly Liberals just as hard as we ever did. They are trying to reinstate a “Fairness Doctrine” that essentially amounts to the unilateral disarming of us, the Conservatives whose voice on radio must never be silenced!

The DA ordered his henchmen to swoop down and take Rush’s medical records WITHOUT court approval and to violate doctor/patient relationships. Rush’s attorney argued this point, but even though the judge agreed with Rush’s attorney, he still said it was OK to bend the rules this time.

Now, there are certain exceptions to the rules that law enforcement can utilize during criminal investigations without first obtaining a warrant. These are called extigent circumstances:

1) Plain view-where the police clearly see illegal stuff in actual plain view.
2) Consent-where the owner of property allows police to search his stuff.
3) Emergency situations(plain view only).
4) Preservation of Evidence-this is where the police witness evidence being moved or destroyed and can move without a warrant and gather up evidence, or REASONABLY believe that evidence is about to be destroyed.
5) Hot pursuit.
6) Incident to LAWFUL arrest (vehicles and persons searches).
7) Prisoners.

Now, I AM NOT AN ATTORNEY, so I will stand corrected by any legally trained person if need be. But, as I see it, none of these extegencies applies to Rush’s situation.

I think that where Rush now resides are hard core lib/Dems including the judges and the DA. Rush is a threat to them, and they want revenge because Al Gore did not win the election, because Kerry did not win the election, because they are not able to set up someone in broadcasting that can rival and surpass Rush. For the lib/dems, Rush is a reactionary! And remember that according to my copy of the COMMUNIST MANIFESTO AND RESTAURANT GUIDE: “The ends justify the means.”

I think that Rush should have perhaps challenged this stuff via the Florida court of appeals and request the Florida State Attorney General’s to investigate the DA who went after Rush.

Could it be that, perhaps, in some states, the Constitution and Criminal Court procedure is indeed…written in pencil?

Just wondering…