Monday, Mark once again has to straighten out the MSM on NRO’s The Corner.
YOO AND PRESIDENTIAL POWER [Mark R. Levin]
John Yoo, a brilliant lawyer, played an important role in writing major aspects of the administration’s legal policies respecting detentions and surveillance. So, not surprisingly, he has been under attack for several years now. Today’s Washington Post has an article in which the first paragraph states: “John Yoo knows the epithets of the libertarians, the liberals and the lefties. Widely considered the intellectual architect of the most dramatic assertion of White House power since the Nixon era, he has seen constitutional scholars skewer his reasoning and students call for his ouster from the University of California at Berkeley.”I reject completely the claim that the Bush administration has pursued “the most dramatic assertion of White House power since the Nixon era.” The fact is the Clinton administration asserted more power than either the Bush or Nixon administrations. Despite the Supreme Court’s precedent in United States v. Nixon, compelling President Nixon to turn over evidence relevant to a criminal investigation (including the tapes), Clinton threw up phony roadblock after phony roadblock claiming presidential authority to obstruct the Starr investigation, all of which ultimately failed. He claimed attorney-client privilege (even where he improperly used government lawyers to work on his private legal matters); executive privilege (again, to prevent prosecutors from gaining access to information surrounding his private activities); and Secret Service protective function privilege (a concoction of the Reno Justice Department to prevent the taking of testimony from Secret Service personnel who witnessed Clinton’s wrongdoing). In each case, courts at every level shot down these unprecedented claims.
And, as we know by now, the ECHELON project has been intercepting electronic communications of every sort, gathering them into a giant database and analyzing the communications, for years, including during the Clinton administration. Clinton bypassed FISA by extending warrantless searches to include physical searches. And he used a spy satellite to gather intelligence on a white separatist compound in Oklahoma after the Oklahoma City bombing. We didn’t hear word-one about threats to civil liberties. So much for the intellectual seriousness of the sanctimonious Left.
Since December 16, when the New York Times published the first NSA story, the big media have largely ignored the actions of past presidents in extending warrantless searches via executive orders; a Supreme Court and four circuit court decisions recognizing the president’s inherent constitutional authority as commander-in-chief to order the intercepts; a FISA Court of Review decision acknowledging presidential authority; and the Constitution itself in trying to portray the Bush administration’s NSA program as unlawful. Now, it ignores the Clinton administration’s abuse of power in an attempt to paint Bush as Nixon, i.e., to raise the specter of Watergate and the imperial presidency. And you thought things would get better when Dan Rather left?
John Yoo deserves a medal. He’s a patriot.
Posted at 12:24 PM











.jpg)












Levin said, “John Yoo deserves a medal. He’s a patriot.”
He can get his medal right after you get yours Mark!
“….Now, it ignores the Clinton administration’s abuse of power ….”
As if THAT is something new!
Just like the left doesn’t like to tranish the Grand old “Dream” of Camelot!
But it appears it was a KENNEDY ( John) and a DEMOCRAT who approved and gave authurization to TAP withOUT and warrents Martin Luther Kings’ phones only on a THOUGHT that there was a communist leader withing his fold.–
–this was done while there was STILL an undercover agent very close next to King!
We..er..don’t exactly have ” anyone Close ” in the al Qeada cells anywhere?? no do we??!!
(unless you count all the dems who give them moral support and help them by trying to pull our troops out too earlier!!Hahahaha!)
Darth AirBorne
p.s.–still no comment from the left to defend their own leaders and Kool Aid drinkers from marching with a ” We’ll Support Our Troops when they Shoot Their Officers ” Banner!!
And THEY say the “right” are “extremists”??
Free speech ONLY works ONE WAY in their eyes!! Go ask Ann Coutler about that too!
Or Michelle Malkin, or Bill Bennet, there’s no sense of fairness or balance in the sociopathic socialist world (sounds like an oxymoron? no, just moron) of the left. God bless John Yoo, but now they’ll be gunning for him too.
John Yoo said that “What he liked most in conservatism was “the grounding in reason and reasonableness.”
That is so true. There is such a huge difference between the sound, reasoned logic found in the arguments made by conservatives, and the unreasonable, hysterical demagoguery that comes from the liberals. The contrast is absolutely mind-boggling.
What Yoo has done is to apply that reasonableness to help the Bush Administration come up with common sense policies in a post 9-11 world that would protect the citizens of this nation from the likes of al Qaeda. He’s done this, while at the same time respecting and abiding by the U.S. Constitution.
And as for all this talk of impeachment that is coming out of the mouths of some Dems, I’d like to see them even try it. The pure, unadulterated nerve of these weasels! God help us if our national security should ever again depend upon the likes of them!
President Bush is a courageous and honorable man, and is doing exactly what he needs to be doing in order to ward off further terrorist attacks. Talk of impeaching him for trying to protect us is simply ignorant, not to mention, ludicrous. For him NOT to take every possible precaution would be more of an impeachable offense, imo.
I’m glad that the Bush Administration has such good people to tap as their advisors. Mark Levin is correct when he says that John Yoo is a patriot. And Mark should know, because it takes one to know one.